Navigation Menu

Climate Engineering Conference 2014 Hypothesis #2

We have come up with the term “CO2 Forcing”.

The deliberate introduction of large quantities of CO2 by various means so as to introduce a mindset of climate emergency.

After much deliberation we believe this is what is going on, among many other similar strategies. Burning fossil fuels in the atmosphere deliberately to introduce CO2 and particulates. As stated previously this will allow a perceived state of climate emergency to be introduced. If that happens, we are in real trouble as it will allow governments to ignore protocol, debate and opinion and simply introduce measures to ‘combat’ the perceived threat without consultation or accountability. We feel this may be the thin end of the intended wedge to then expand that emergency mindset to other broader areas, and possibly eventually to society as a whole. If one were to take the deeper conspiracy road, then we could possibly also start to question the vilification of the nuclear industry as a suitable replacement for fossil fuels, and the lack of investment in promising alternative energies such as wind wave and solar. Certainly geo-engineering is affecting the value and efficiency of solar equipment due to massively reduced sunlight, so we see a pattern emerging here. Stay with oil and coal and gas. Keep alternatives at bay. Introduce an emergency mindset, and on the back of that a general state of emergency. is concerned mostly with planes, and we exposed the wholesale burning of what appear to be fossil fuels from aircraft in the mid troposphere (30-35,000ft). We only realised the significance of this after having been to CEC14. If you search the term “forest fires started deliberately”, you get a plethora of results. The big ones we know about in Australia and California, but there seem to be many other examples across the globe. We also know about peat bogs being burnt and even coal mines. We have not had time to research this properly, but when we start to look at all the various sources of CO2 we realise many are avoidable at best and deliberate at worst, so it is hard to deny that some forcing is going on. If there really were an impending climate emergency, these issues would be addressed and quelled before any really effective debate and measures could be be put in place, but instead we see relentless focus on what appear to be very tenuous sources such as diesel cars, industry and man generally. Let us consider that one of the sponsors of the CEC14 event was the Club of Rome. The following quote is widely attributed to them:

“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
– Club of Rome –

So we start to see that this is not an unreasonable conclusion to draw. Our smokers video, now with around 17,000 views, is pretty conclusive evidence of commercial planes introducing thick black smoke into the atmosphere over Europe. We informed The Daily Mail news-desk of this film and they have failed to respond. If planes pumping thick black smoke into the air when we face a supposed global climate catastrophe is not news then what is? Oh yes, of course… celebrity fashion faux pas.

Are we there yet?

Watch the Smokers video


Pet Bogs contributing to global CO2 levels

Russian peat bogs