Climate Engineering, referred to as Geo-engineering in the US, is the umbrella term for the official climate control programs proposed by the IASS, Royal Society, SRMGI and a clique of scientific advisers such as Professor David Keith, Ken Caldeira, Clive Hamilton, Prof. John Shepherd and others. It covers many ideas in the 2 categories of Carbon Sequestration and Solar Radiation Management, but essentially we feel this is all about allowing corporations to spray chemicals – the nature of which has still not been decided – to block sunshine on the premise it is warming our atmosphere. We believe atmospheric aerosol spraying programs are already underway and being executed using specially modified commercial passenger jets.
Because nothing has been admitted to yet, these programs are still covert, our campaign is 2-pronged; to make people realise this is already happening, but also to inform people of the proposed programs so that when the political-scientific establishment behind these plans finally have to declare that they are about to commence what they will term trials, enough people realise the reality of what is happening in the hope that there may be enough people to object and halt their introduction.
Our position and interpretation of the situation as a whole
This website’s official position is that we know Climate Engineering to be happening now, all over Europe, and evidence from around the world suggests that it is a global phenomenon. We have also now accepted that Global Warming, which had to be re-branded Climate Change due to no warming for 18 years*, is a hoax. A politically and financially motivated ideology backed primarily by global corporations and the EU for reasons we expand on in other parts of the site. The latter point is not our focus but is pivotal to this subject because the perceived threat of Climate Change is being used to justify the introduction of Climate Engineering, or as we see it the approval of Climate Engineering so it can continue unabated.
Once one comes to understand this fundamental point then everything we hear in our media starts to take on a new meaning and we are able to read between the lines of the so-called debates and facts and figures rolled out to us each week with an ever-increasing sense of urgency and desperation. The urgency and desperation are portrayed as being the result of the worry about runaway warming and supposed climate catastrophe, but are actually motivated by the fear of financial and political loss.
Allow us explain – We are now locked in a kind of race. If the public realises that our weather is being modified on a grand scale before the corporations behind these programs are able to have them approved then they lose because the public are unlikely to give their approval. They will have to stop, our clean air and sunshine will return and we will then be asking why they did it without our permission and why our governments did nothing to stop them. They will also lose the billions invested in the technology and infrastructure that has been created to make it possible. On a wider note, it will also disable their ability to control markets associated with weather prediction and agriculture that can be influenced or controlled by such careful control of our weather, even down to a local level. If, however, they manage to get them approved on the grounds that they are saving us from this supposed climate catastrophe that is going to destroy us all then they can simply continue as if nothing had happened and we then stand little or no chance of being able to stop them thereafter as it has become clear to most, even leaving aside the climate issue, that ministers basically do what corporations tell them to.
The other possible scenario we have come to realise may be unfolding is the emergency hypothesis. During our time at the Climate Engineering Conference in Berlin in 2014 we became aware that the perceived emergency may be used to bypass the process of public approval. We have written about this in several articles such as this one and our documentary – Climate Engineering Research Symposium 2015 – published in late 2015 also addresses this very worrying point. If governments continue to fain inability to react to the perceived threat of Climate Change and the complicit media and assorted environmental organisations continue to ramp up the alarmist propaganda to fever pitch as they are then we may reach a situation whereby they allow Climate Engineering to commence officially without any approval whatsoever on the grounds that there is no time for approval… “we must do this now for the greater good” they will claim. It is unclear whether a state of emergency will, or will need to be, declared for this to happen, or if it will simply begin quietly, or simply continue as it is now, with little or no mention of it in the press or scientific literature. We feel the latter is the most likely scenario and indeed recent events in the Paris Climate circus seem to suggest this is where we are heading. The COP21 agreement has bound all signatory nations to limit warming to 1.5 Celsius. This in itself seems innocuous enough but if we look at this with our previous comments in mind it seems that without Climate Engineering (CE) being ‘started’ those targets are unrealistic. Clearly we know that the figures and so-called ‘facts’ that the agreement is based on are meaningless because we know that CE is the cause of local temperature anomalies but the public have not yet made that connection so the circus will bulldozer its way forward irrespective of any dissent and try to use this agreement to force CE on us as an emergency measure.
So you see this is not a silly little issue about a few planes making a few clouds, this is actually a gargantuan issue that could define our future, and that of our environment as a whole. Will the people allow corporate interests to control our weather and thus our environment at large. We wont go into that debate here, suffice to say that few realise the stakes in this subject are unimaginably high. Dramatic language you may think, but that is really the essence of what is going on. Of course the media will have you believe that this is all nonsense and those that are proposing this are clearly mad or paranoid or whatever, but our investigations have resulted in a very clear understand of this situation now and this website presents more than adequate evidence to show this is happening.
Our ultimate aim is to bring the current Climate Engineering programs, with specific focus on every form of aerial aerosol spraying, to a halt and prevent the public or official approval or introduction of the proposed programs in any way. There is no doubt in our mind now that people are noticing the effects of the current aerial aerosol spraying programs in increasing numbers and almost everywhere now but they don’t realise what they are looking at or the implications. That is why we created this website and campaign, so as to ensure people can get the real facts with no mumbo-jumbo or drama, and to give them clear understanding of what is happening and why.
We are working on this on many levels with our research and investigations, public campaigning and reporting of our observations to regulatory bodies. We are also currently preparing the Climate Engineering Dossier 2017 (version 2) to be handed into Downing Street this spring. Sadly most of our efforts to raise awareness and prompt action in our regulatory bodies and government departments are being stonewalled. We have made repeated attempts to report what amounts to illegal and dangerous behaviour by airlines spraying substances unknown into our sky and they are either ignored or answered with denial, excuses and diversionary tactics. We spent most of 2016 compiling evidence of this and will publish articles in the coming weeks detailing a failure to act by The CAA, NATS, The MET Office and airlines. Some of these investigations are still ongoing.
We are fighting relentlessly to get our sunshine and clean air back. Please help if you can. We will also be launching 2 fundraisers this spring to raise money for a campaign bus and to fund a new feature film we are planning to document the 2017 IASS Climate Engineering Conference to be held in Berlin in October this year. We managed to get a very important documentary published from the material we recorded at the Climate Engineering Research Symposium 2015. in Berlin and hope to build on the success of that film. Success side, it is crucial that these events are documented from a sceptical perspective as nobody else is doing this at a professional level.
We will be focusing on fundraising this year as well as our new film. Sadly we have reached the point where to progress this and bring it into the courts and public consciousness we need help. To be effective and prove this in the courts we need people to help gather, compile and produce the evidence to a level that is legally solid. This involves a lot of work and money. I also need help with planning and producing our new film, so there is much to do this year.
Each year we up the ante, and we feel 2017 will be a crucial year in the fight to stop the introduction of corporate control of our weather. Please support us in any way you can. I have nearly run out of money and am so busy with family, job and my production business that I have less and less time to be out there doing the work that needs to be done to progress this.
If you can afford to help financially please donate. This campaign has cost tens of thousands of pounds of my own money to reach this stage, and is very expensive to maintain. If I run out of money the momentum will stop and we may miss our chance just as we are starting to make a real difference.
Editor and founder of Look-Up.org.uk
In response our government’s refusal to acknowledge this is happening despite overwhelming evidence we have adopted a well-known saying by Abraham Lincoln as our motto:
“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time”.
16th president of US (1809 – 1865)
* even the IPCC had to admit that there had been no surface warming for 18 years, so they quickly trotted off an excuse about the oceans absorbing the heat. They are simply making this stuff up as they go along.