Navigation Menu
…there isn’t really any hard evidence… Err..?

…there isn’t really any hard evidence… Err..?

By on Jul 7, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

When we hear this comment it reminds us of Monty Python’s What have the Romans Ever Done For Us… “I read your website and it is interesting but there isn’t really any hard evidence…” Seriously? When we hear this comment it reminds us of the infamous Monty Python sketch from the Life of Brian – What have the Romans Ever Done For Us. “Yes alright, but apart from the fact that long-haul flights divert from their flight paths to pick up cargo at mysterious airstrips in Africa en-route to the UK, and apart from the retrofitted pylon pipes, and apart from the evidence of black trails, and apart from the fact that planes now make clouds and they never used to, and apart from the existence of strange iridescent clouds, and apart from all the new cloud types invented by the MET Office to explain all these strange things we now see, and apart from the 3 large containers loaded onto the front cargo hold on Airbus A320s where luggage is no longer allowed, and apart from the fact that Airbus A320s are now crashing at an impossibly high frequency in suspicious circumstances, and apart from the irregular and suspicious use of ADS-B systems broadcasting false altitude data on flights that leave trails over the UK, and apart from the fact flights are routed out of their way to pass over UK cities, and apart from the fact that flights often travel in pairs or even 3s now, and apart from the fact that the new type of Induced Cumulus clouds only ever form over land and in long rows, and apart from the fact that our skies are always hazy and never clear anymore, and apart from the fact that last year there were less than 10 days with completely clear skies over the UK… breath… what have Look-Up.org.uk ever done to show this is happening now, eh? There exist people who do not drink much alcohol, who do not smoke, who drink a lot of tap water and who watch a lot of Television (all clues we hasten to add) who are utterly convinced that everything is exactly how it is presented to us by the establishment...

Read More
Scientists apparently ‘floored’ by what’s happening in the Arctic

Scientists apparently ‘floored’ by what’s happening in the Arctic

By on May 26, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

Well allow us to explain then. We reveal what is really causing Arctic melting and question why nobody is talking about it The mainstream media, that bastion of truth that society seems naively to rely on for its information about the world, is all too keen to use the word scientists at the beginning of an increasingly frequent deluge of articles that amount to nothing less than disinformation. Being diligent citizens, as most commuting, paper-reading types are, they attach a disturbing amount of affirmation to the word when used as a journalistic prefix. As a whole, society trusts doctors and scientists the most and, unsurprisingly, politicians the least. This is why the latter have enlisted some of the former to do their dirty work. Just mention scientists at the beginning of any article and the rest is instantly fact to the average reader; no reasoning or further investigation needed. Thank you very much, job done. Or is it? Thankfully there are an increasingly large and reassuring number of people who are starting to question the authority and legitimacy of this prefix, and with good reason. Skewed, faked or just plain pseudo-science is increasingly being used to try to bully society into accepting political ideology and things that don’t quite make sense or are unpalatable or unappealing. The following article, which appeared in the Independent Environment page in February this year, is a perfect example:   Full article here   This article goes on to reveal ‘shocking’ statistics about the increasing temperature of the Arctic region. It contains all the hallmarks of alarmist pseudo-science, being full of frightening ‘facts’ and impressive data and images, along with the usual images of factories spewing smoke. The fact that it mentions the word scientists immediately gives it credibility, but who are these scientists and why are they making such basic mistakes., that is if they are mistakes. Interesting that no names are mentioned. The information derives only from studies apparently conducted by NASA and NOAA. It is quite ambiguous in its conclusions but crucially fails to mention aviation even once as the primary cause or even as a contributing factor.   This is thoroughbred disinformation in its purest form. The idea is to...

Read More
Land-hugging Induced Cumulus noticed from Int. Space Station

Land-hugging Induced Cumulus noticed from Int. Space Station

By on May 25, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

We would like to say that our article titled Induced Cumulus has inspired others to question what they see. We can’t claim a direct link to this post by Tim Peake on the International Space Station, but we can rejoice in the fact that people are now questioning this phenomena and generally questioning what they see rather than just blindly believing what they are being told on the TV.   We were delighted to see this image recently, taken by Tim Peake from the ISS – International Space Station. It shows England covered in the Induced Cumulus clouds we reported on some time ago – another world-first for Look-Up.org.uk we hasten to ad. The comment accompanying the image is beautifully subtle but actually very telling. Sometimes I wonder if the UK is hiding under cloud deliberately. Oh Tim, you have no idea how right you are ! We wrote to the MET Office and reported our concerns about this strange new phenomena. It took them a long time to respond, as we describe in our previous article on the subject, as they probably had to bring in a creative director to try to fabricate something remotely believable, but when they eventually did respond it was gold. I mean a big, gleaming 1kg bar of 24 carat gold bullion, on a tray of deep plush purple velvet with flowers round it. Get this… They claim that these new ‘clouds’ only form on land because it is warmer over land, and that they form in big lines because they are… Cloud Streets. Err sorry could you repeat that please… Cloud Streets. Oh yes of course silly us, Cloud Streets, that well-known weather phenomena that we all grew up with and which is mentioned regularly on the weather forecast and always has been. Laugh. Chair. Fall off. Etc The images shown on the web page provided are examples of what are referred to as cloud streets. This phenomenon is well-documented in the scientific literature – a casual search of our own library catalogue for entries with “cloud street” as a keyword identifies 84 records, with the earliest going back to 1953. In the examples shown, cloud formation is confined to the land...

Read More
Black trails – incontrovertible proof

Black trails – incontrovertible proof

By on May 20, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

The word incontrovertible is used all too often, but in this case it is entirely justified Campaigners and activists desperate to convince sleepy Mr. & Mrs. average to wake TF up and question what they see often use the word. It is not wrong to do so as invariably they know they are right and are simply trying to emphasise what they are saying. In this case, however, we feel we are entirely justified to use the term incontrovertible proof, because there is nothing anyone can say that can explain what we see, no matter how hard they try, except the truth… which is clearly that something, probably fossil fuel and probably raw diesel, is being pumped from a commercially liveried jet into the its exhaust plume to create huge trails of combusted diesel fumes. Even the disinformation websites such as Metabunk and Contrail Science that specialise in convoluted pseudo-science to try to debunk anything they consider to be sensitive were not able to explain this one away. The best they could do was to suggest the trials were black because they were in a shadow lol. Even my son, who was 8 at the time laughed and said there was nothing between the sun and the trail so how can it be a shadow, and anyway common sense tells us that even if it were in a shadow, no aircraft could ever produce such thick black smoke unless something was going on. In a funny way the fact that even tried to debunk it worked in our favour because even hardened sceptics could see very clearly this was not natural, normal or benign. We shall stop there as no more needs to be said really. This is conclusive. The world’s most clear evidence that commercial jets are being used to alter the atmosphere by discharging something into it. We will explain it in more detail in time, but in the mean time just watch and allow the jaw to slowly drop. Personally I still get shivers down my spine every time I watch this even after 2 years.   The film is titled Smokers for obvious reasons www.vimeo.com/88080046 www.vimeo.com/88080046      ...

Read More
Yet another A320 down in suspicious circumstances

Yet another A320 down in suspicious circumstances

By on May 19, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

How many times can this happen before people start to question it we wonder? Published on: May 19, 2016 It is with great sadness and utter dismay that we report yet another A320 has gone down as predicted. Sadness of course for the passengers, but dismay at the fact that still nobody seems to be questioning publicly why so many A320s are crashing in mysterious circumstances. Of course the immediate claims of terrorism are being trotted off as authorities panic, wondering what on earth they are going to say this time to an increasingly alarmed public following the latest in what is likely to be a mid-air explosion caused by pressurised Climate Engineering systems on board the A320.   Because this incident occurred at sea, the authorities hold all the cards and we have nothing really to work on except what we are fed through mainstream media, unlike in other similar incidents in LA, Istanbul and Sinai where we had very visible clues from the wreckage of the aircraft in question.   Timeline   Terrorism Immediately we saw the usual authority sources try to claim or insinuate that terrorism was to blame even before any investigations had taken place. It is interesting that Egypt’s Prime Minister has so eagerly backed this hypothesis within hours of the crash, surprising because it was Egyptian aviation experts that denied for a long time that any evidence of explosives was found when the Sinai incident occurred not that long ago. This is now the default response to all of these increasingly freuent events. It seems to be a tactic to try to lay the page for the inevitable terrorist story to build on as they try to look at the evidence and fabricate something almost believable. Despite this the story i previous incidents has had to change several times as various source pointed out glaring problems. A classic example was the Sinai incident in which the CIA likely called the local faction of ISIS and told them to claim responsibility. They duly released a low-res video of them firing a missile. Case closed they though as they went back to the dinner table, but military experts then pointed out that the missiles that...

Read More
Ain’t no sunshine…Satellite images 2015

Ain’t no sunshine…
Satellite images 2015

By on Oct 21, 2015 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

There were no completely clear days in 2015. Published on: Oct 21, 2015 – we have not had a chance to update the gallery but you can view these images online at the NASA Worldview website. In 2015 there were 12 days which had 50% or less cloud cover over England. There was one day with about 10% cloud cover. The rest were mostly cloudy with 50-100% cloud cover. There were no days at all that were completely clear of cloud. In 2013 – the first full year of images currently available – there were 13 days that were about 50% or less cloud cover, with only a couple with 10% or less. The rest were 50-100% cloud cover. There were no days completely clear of cloud. Even on the days where the satellite image shows a reasonably cloud free day, the image may have been taken very early before the cloud cover had been produced, so it is possible that there simply are no completely clear days anymore. There is a way to discover the time the images were taken but we have not had the chance to do this yet and to be honest it matter not. No clear day at all is enough information for us. Incredible as that sounds, go see for yourself. Unfortunately NASA only publish images from mid 2012. It would be extremely interesting to see images from the 1970s and 1980.   We liked this statement in the FAQs: Why are there so many clouds? Approximately 70% of the earth’s surface is covered by clouds at any given time. That means there is a good chance that the region you want to see will have some cloud cover. Use the time slider at the bottom of Worldview to view other dates. Most of that cloud was induced cloud produced by aviation. Some scientists will try to tell that’s because of global warming, but the arguments don’t make sense. There is no natural process that is happening now that can create such vast cloud cover over the UK. Average temperatures on land or sea have not warmed, so why is there so much cloud? Simple. Aviation. Below we have compiled a gallery of...

Read More