Navigation Menu
Is air pollution the new Global Warming and the latest Establishment ruse?

Is air pollution the new Global Warming and the latest Establishment ruse?

By on Jun 22, 2017 in Homepage Feature |

They tried for nearly 40 years to convince us the world was warming but we eventually realised it wasn’t so they came up with new scare story That we faced a climate catastrophe. That the oceans would rise up and engulf us like some beast from below. That the end was nigh unless we gave up all of our privacy, liberty and freedoms and surrendered ourselves to them so they could unite us all in panic to fight this global threat to our existence. The only problem is that global mean temperatures didn’t rise, in fact they have been stable now for more than 20 years (a fact very reluctantly admitted to by the IPCC in 2013 [1] ). Genuine scientists believe we are actually in a cooling phase [2]; the mini ice age that was predicted in the 1970s before Global Warming had been invented by the Club Of Rome as a way to achieve global unity and hence global control. Nowadays we know it as globalism but it’s far from a new ideology. It has been planned for many decades. The oceans haven’t risen either – despite the best efforts of the aviation industry to melt Arctic ice by sending 50,000 flights a year over the Arctic, creating vast amounts of cloud cover which warms the atmosphere, not to mention the ‘Black Carbon‘ trails which turn the ice black increasing melting further [3] [4]. In fact, despite increasingly desperate and dire headlines in the Murdock Media everything seems relatively normal actually. So much so in fact that even Mr. & Mrs Rich T Biscuit are now wondering what on earth all the fuss was about and what on earth these mad old boffins are on about. What a lot of tosh. So… hundreds of $billions have been invested in scaring the hell out of us but we haven’t fallen for it at all, or maybe a little bit in the middle perhaps but certainly people are now largely dismissing the Global Warming – re-branded Climate Change – fiasco as a rather unfortunate mistake at best, or possibly a blatant hoax at worst. Clearly the latter in our minds. So, this leaves a very large section of the...

Read More
ProjectsThis is how we do it

Projects
This is how we do it

By on Feb 8, 2017 in Homepage Feature |

This year is going to be a crucial one in the fight to return our skies to the big deep blue and fresh clean air we used to have back in the 1970s. We have several things lined up starting small and getting bigger as the year progresses. We have spent the past 4 years investigating, researching, submitting evidence and cornering the organisations involved in, complicit in, or those who simply choose to ignore Solar Radiation Management. The idea is that they now have nowhere left to hide. We have the evidence. We have the denials. We have the  letters and emails refusing to act in the public interest. Now we will act. Not only to show people the wilful negligence of those who are supposed to have our interests at heart such as the CAA, but also to initiate legal action to bring these people and organisations to justice and to make them accountable for their illegal, immoral and reckless conduct. We will also be making a feature-length documentary film on the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 event in Berlin this year. This is a big project and will require about. £20-25,000 to complete, so we are going to be pushing hard for people to finally dig deep and donate to ensure this campaign achieves is ultimate goal of preventing the official approval by the EU and European regulatory bodies if the proposed SRM programs which we feel is imminent. Read more below.     2017 Campaign Trailer – Easy as 1 – 2 – 3 We need to raise £6000 for this trailer. We have purchased the trailer already for £3000. The remaining £3000 is for signage and promotional material. If we raise more than £6000 we will purchase a large TV and computer so we can show people footage of SRM in progress in UK and time-lapse films of SRM. We realised early on that the only way to do this successfully is to get out there and meet people. With a proven track record over 4 years of direct campaigning you know that your money will be spent wisely and used for maximum effect. Brighton-2 Camp Bestival Global March-London Hyde Park Corner London The MET Office...

Read More
Facts are facts.There is no warming.

Facts are facts.
There is no warming.

By on Oct 13, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

That is why Global Warming had to be re-branded as Climate Change. Despite the best efforts of the Climate Engineering movement to warm our atmosphere by dumping thousands of tonnes of aerosols and particulates every day, the global average temperature has not changed significantly and there is no observable warming trend whatsoever. Climate Change is the new and stupifyingly ambiguous name for Global Warming. The world didn’t warm, so they moved the goal posts preferring to rely on more subtle and hard-to-prove things like flooding and extreme weather to scare us. Both Global Warming and Climate Change have been force-fed to society for so long and so relentlessly that most people are utterly convinced it is real. Though the more astute seem to have worked out that it hasn’t warmed or that the media seem to hysterical about it, presenting very one-sided reportage, the majority of people still believe that the world is somehow under threat from this terrible thing that threatens to both drown us and burn us alive.   The real science The reason most average people remain convinced about the warming theory is that the media, that bastion of truth and independence (not) that most people rely on for their information, only reports pro-warming and alarmist ‘science’. They conveniently ignore, or try to rubbish, the fact that 31,487 scientists to date, including 112 atmospheric scientists and 32 climatologists have signed a petition to the US government stating that they do not support any of the alarmist science behind the Global Warming Hoax, and feel the draconian legislation that is planned is politically motivated rather than anything to do with science.   The following websites are just a few of the multitude of pages that provide information that show that Global Warming, and its ambiguously re-branded name Climate Change, are just a huge political hoax.   Weather Action Global Climate Scam Climate Change Hoax Global Warming Hoax NIPCC Articles in the press Daily Express – Climate Change biggest hoax in history     Real weather records Fortunately there are many people who make it their business to monitor the weather and it these people who are so valuable in our fight to expose the truth about what...

Read More
Video footage and filmsOur Vimeo Channels

Video footage and films
Our Vimeo Channels

By on Oct 11, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

Links to our Vimeo channels, with stunning footage of CE in action and time-lapse of skies over London This page directs you to some of the latest footage we have taken with our new 83x Nikon camera, plus our almost* daily time-lapse skies over West London. in this modern age of immediate reward, many find it too strenuous or time-consuming to read page after page of evidence and comment, so we created 2 channels on Vimeo to show some of the more recent film footage we have taken about this subject. This is by no means all we have done, and indeed we have terabytes of footage still waiting to be published but much of it related directly to as yet unpublished investigations. What you will see though is some stunning clips, short films and out documentaries that show unequivocally that aircraft are being used to release aerosols into our skies during flight. If one takes the time to watch as much as they can, there really is nowhere else to go other than to accept this is happening. no amount of denial, pseudoscience or denigration theories can explain massive plumes of stuff coming out of the pylon of planes flying as low as 16,000 or less over London on summer days. Even the official science states very clearly that it cannot be condensation or ice crystals as the MET Office are trying to claim. We shall leave it there…. images often speak a thousand words. Enjoy !   Look-Up.org.uk vimeo.com/channels/lookupcampaign This is where we show all of the clips we have released so far, mostly aircraft ans short films associated with the topic. Time Lapse Skies London vimeo.com/channels/timelapseskieslondon   this channel is dedicated purely to the time-lapse films we now record over West london. We try to ensure we cover every day, but this is depending on work load....

Read More
SRM is cause of warming, not the solution

SRM is cause of warming, not the solution

By on Jul 12, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

More and more genuine science is pointing to current SRM programs being cause of Climate Change A recent article published by Uni.no reports that a study published recently by Jerry Tjiputra and colleagues at Uni Research and the Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research highlights something we have been saying since late 2013; Climate Engineering, specifically SRM – Solar Radiation Management – is the likely cause of current weather anomalies and not a solution for the ever flailing theory of Global Warming and it’s even more ambiguously termed re-branded name Climate Change. Impact of idealized future stratospheric aerosol injection on the large-scale ocean and land carbon cycles The abstract can be viewed and the full paper can be purchased here for a small fee. Though the paper does not directly suggest CE is happening now and the cause any unusual weather phenomena and environmental anomalies, it does suggest that CE would cause negative consequences for oceans, water cycles and land environments. It is hard to ignore the fact that there is a strong correlation between what the paper suggest would happen if these programs were implemented and what we are seeing in patterns in the Biosphere and Hydrosphere right now. Their simulations indicate that a large change in precipitation patterns will occur which will alter the productivity of terrestrial vegetation. In addition, ocean conveyor belt circulation will be affected, leading to a wide-spread and acceleration of ocean acidification rate in the North Atlantic seafloor, 3 examples from the paper are changes in global precipitation patterns, a disruption of the gulf stream and other ocean currents, and increased ocean acidification   “…deliberate climate fix, where you inject a large amount of aerosol particles to the sky in order to prevent global warming, should not be considered as a strategy to stop climate change.”   Other examples The scientific world is awash with papers and articles that cast doubt on the entire CE debate, citing all manner of risks problems with the idea, including the rather glaring problems that the world is not actually warming, and the fact that spraying chemicals into the sky would not do anything to reduce what is now hailed as the cause of Global Warming – CO2....

Read More
Mayor’s farcical T-charge is a smoke-screen

Mayor’s farcical T-charge is a smoke-screen

By on Jul 9, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

Sadiq Khan’s farcical plan to clean up London’s air fails to mention aviation as real cause of the UK’s smogs… On Monday 5th July 2015 Sadiq Khan, the new Mayor of London unveiled his plan to tax drivers of older and higher-polluting vehicles entering the congestion charging zone. The misguided idea forms part of a wider initiative to reduce air pollution in London, but the plans do not address, or even mention the real cause of the poor air quality in the capital rendering them utterly farcical and confirming that the establishment are clearly trying anything they can to divert attention from the massive pollution from aviation over the UK.     Timed to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the Clean Air Act Mr Khan plans to clamp down on pollution from vehicles in the whole of London, rather than just in the central zone as it currently stands, and plans to drastically cut the level of emissions in central London creating an Ultra Low Emissions Zone or ULEZ. His press release states: – Implementing a £10 Emissions Surcharge (dubbed the ‘T-charge’) on the most polluting vehicles entering central London from 2017.  The charge would apply to all vehicles with pre-Euro 4 emission standards (broadly speaking those registered before 2005) and will cost an extra £10 per day on top of the existing Congestion Charge. – Introducing the central London Ultra-Low Emission Zone one year earlier in 2019 – Extending the Ultra-Low Emission Zone (‘ULEZ’) beyond central London from 2020: for motorcycles, cars and vans, to the North and South Circular; and for lorries, buses and coaches London-wide The full text including the other measures can be seen here.   Barking up the wrong tree All impressive sounding stuff but all this big-talk from the new kid on the block is clearly just a fanfare to accompany his arrival on the London Stage and try to win favour. The entire plan is utterly misguided at best, or at worst a blatant attempt to divert attention away from the real cause of the terrible pollution in the capital… aviation. Having listened carefully to him since his appointment as Mayor of London, we suspect the latter. This would also explain why Mr....

Read More
…there isn’t really any hard evidence… Err..?

…there isn’t really any hard evidence… Err..?

By on Jul 7, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

When we hear this comment it reminds us of Monty Python’s What have the Romans Ever Done For Us… “I read your website and it is interesting but there isn’t really any hard evidence…” Seriously? When we hear this comment it reminds us of the infamous Monty Python sketch from the Life of Brian – What have the Romans Ever Done For Us. “Yes alright, but apart from the fact that long-haul flights divert from their flight paths to pick up cargo at mysterious airstrips in Africa en-route to the UK, and apart from the retrofitted pylon pipes, and apart from the evidence of black trails, and apart from the fact that planes now make clouds and they never used to, and apart from the existence of strange iridescent clouds, and apart from all the new cloud types invented by the MET Office to explain all these strange things we now see, and apart from the 3 large containers loaded onto the front cargo hold on Airbus A320s where luggage is no longer allowed, and apart from the fact that Airbus A320s are now crashing at an impossibly high frequency in suspicious circumstances, and apart from the irregular and suspicious use of ADS-B systems broadcasting false altitude data on flights that leave trails over the UK, and apart from the fact flights are routed out of their way to pass over UK cities, and apart from the fact that flights often travel in pairs or even 3s now, and apart from the fact that the new type of Induced Cumulus clouds only ever form over land and in long rows, and apart from the fact that our skies are always hazy and never clear anymore, and apart from the fact that last year there were less than 10 days with completely clear skies over the UK… breath… what have Look-Up.org.uk ever done to show this is happening now, eh? There exist people who do not drink much alcohol, who do not smoke, who drink a lot of tap water and who watch a lot of Television (all clues we hasten to add) who are utterly convinced that everything is exactly how it is presented to us by the establishment...

Read More
Scientists apparently ‘floored’ by what’s happening in the Arctic

Scientists apparently ‘floored’ by what’s happening in the Arctic

By on May 26, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

Well allow us to explain then. We reveal what is really causing Arctic melting and question why nobody is talking about it The mainstream media, that bastion of truth that society seems naively to rely on for its information about the world, is all too keen to use the word scientists at the beginning of an increasingly frequent deluge of articles that amount to nothing less than disinformation. Being diligent citizens, as most commuting, paper-reading types are, they attach a disturbing amount of affirmation to the word. As a whole, society trusts doctors and scientists the most and, unsurprisingly, politicians the least. This is why the latter have enlisted some of the former to do their dirty work. Just mention scientists at the beginning of any article and the rest is instantly fact to the average reader; no reasoning or further investigation needed. Thank you very much, job done. Or is it? Thankfully there are an increasingly large and reassuring number of people who are starting to question the authority and legitimacy of this prefix, and with good reason. Skewed, faked or just plain pseudo-science is increasingly being used to try to bully society into accepting political ideology and things that don’t quite make sense or are unpalatable or unappealing. The following article, which appeared in the Independent Environment page in February this year, is a perfect example:   Full article here   This article goes on to reveal ‘shocking’ statistics about the increasing temperature of the Arctic region. It contains all the hallmarks of alarmist pseudo-science, being full of frightening ‘facts’ and impressive data and images, along with the usual images of factories spewing smoke. The fact that is mentions the word scientists immediately gives it credibility, but who are these scientists and why are they making such basic mistakes., that is if they are mistakes. Interesting that no names are mentioned. The information derives only from studies apparently conducted by NASA and NOAA, both of whom are funded directly form by the US Congress. It is quite ambiguous in its conclusions but seems to blame the warming mostly on an unusually pronounced El Nino effect.   This is thoroughbred disinformation in its purest form. The idea is...

Read More
Land-hugging Induced Cumulus noticed from Int. Space Station

Land-hugging Induced Cumulus noticed from Int. Space Station

By on May 25, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

We would like to say that our article titled Induced Cumulus has inspired others to question what they see. We can’t claim a direct link to this post by Tim Peake on the International Space Station, but we can rejoice in the fact that people are now questioning this phenomena and generally questioning what they see rather than just blindly believing what they are being told on the TV.   We were delighted to see this image recently, taken by Tim Peake from the ISS – International Space Station. It shows England covered in the Induced Cumulus clouds we reported on some time ago – another world-first for Look-Up.org.uk we hasten to ad. The comment accompanying the image is beautifully subtle but actually very telling. Sometimes I wonder if the UK is hiding under cloud deliberately. Oh Tim, you have no idea how right you are ! We wrote to the MET Office and reported our concerns about this strange new phenomena. It took them a long time to respond, as we describe in our previous article on the subject, as they probably had to bring in a creative director to try to fabricate something remotely believable, but when they eventually did respond it was gold. I mean a big, gleaming 1kg bar of 24 carat gold bullion, on a tray of deep plush purple velvet with flowers round it. Get this… They claim that these new ‘clouds’ only form on land because it is warmer over land, and that they form in big lines because they are… Cloud Streets. Err sorry could you repeat that please… Cloud Streets. Oh yes of course silly us, Cloud Streets, that well-known weather phenomena that we all grew up with and which is mentioned regularly on the weather forecast and always has been. Laugh. Chair. Fall off. Etc The images shown on the web page provided are examples of what are referred to as cloud streets. This phenomenon is well-documented in the scientific literature – a casual search of our own library catalogue for entries with “cloud street” as a keyword identifies 84 records, with the earliest going back to 1953. In the examples shown, cloud formation is confined to the land...

Read More
Black trails – incontrovertible proof

Black trails – incontrovertible proof

By on May 20, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

The word incontrovertible is used all too often, but in this case it is entirely justified Campaigners and activists desperate to convince sleepy Mr. & Mrs. average to wake TF up and question what they see often use the word. It is not wrong to do so as invariably they know they are right and are simply trying to emphasise what they are saying. In this case, however, we feel we are entirely justified to use the term incontrovertible proof, because there is nothing anyone can say that can explain what we see, no matter how hard they try, except the truth… which is clearly that something, probably fossil fuel and probably raw diesel, is being pumped from a commercially liveried jet into the its exhaust plume to create huge trails of combusted diesel fumes. Even the disinformation websites such as Metabunk and Contrail Science that specialise in convoluted pseudo-science to try to debunk anything they consider to be sensitive were not able to explain this one away. The best they could do was to suggest the trials were black because they were in a shadow lol. Even my son, who was 8 at the time laughed and said there was nothing between the sun and the trail so how can it be a shadow, and anyway common sense tells us that even if it were in a shadow, no aircraft could ever produce such thick black smoke unless something was going on. In a funny way the fact that even tried to debunk it worked in our favour because even hardened sceptics could see very clearly this was not natural, normal or benign. We shall stop there as no more needs to be said really. This is conclusive. The world’s most clear evidence that commercial jets are being used to alter the atmosphere by discharging something into it. We will explain it in more detail in time, but in the mean time just watch and allow the jaw to slowly drop. Personally I still get shivers down my spine every time I watch this even after 2 years.   The film is titled Smokers for obvious reasons www.vimeo.com/88080046 www.vimeo.com/88080046      ...

Read More
Yet another A320 down in suspicious circumstances

Yet another A320 down in suspicious circumstances

By on May 19, 2016 in Homepage Feature |

How many times can this happen before people start to question it we wonder? Published on: May 19, 2016 It is with great sadness and utter dismay that we report yet another A320 has gone down as predicted. Sadness of course for the passengers, but dismay at the fact that still nobody seems to be questioning publicly why so many A320s are crashing in mysterious circumstances. Of course the immediate claims of terrorism are being trotted off as authorities panic, wondering what on earth they are going to say this time to an increasingly alarmed public following the latest in what is likely to be a mid-air explosion caused by pressurised Climate Engineering systems on board the A320.   Because this incident occurred at sea, the authorities hold all the cards and we have nothing really to work on except what we are fed through mainstream media, unlike in other similar incidents in LA, Istanbul and Sinai where we had very visible clues from the wreckage of the aircraft in question.   Timeline   Terrorism Immediately we saw the usual authority sources try to claim or insinuate that terrorism was to blame even before any investigations had taken place. It is interesting that Egypt’s Prime Minister has so eagerly backed this hypothesis within hours of the crash, surprising because it was Egyptian aviation experts that denied for a long time that any evidence of explosives was found when the Sinai incident occurred not that long ago. This is now the default response to all of these increasingly freuent events. It seems to be a tactic to try to lay the page for the inevitable terrorist story to build on as they try to look at the evidence and fabricate something almost believable. Despite this the story i previous incidents has had to change several times as various source pointed out glaring problems. A classic example was the Sinai incident in which the CIA likely called the local faction of ISIS and told them to claim responsibility. They duly released a low-res video of them firing a missile. Case closed they though as they went back to the dinner table, but military experts then pointed out that the missiles that...

Read More
Ain’t no sunshine…Satellite images 2015

Ain’t no sunshine…
Satellite images 2015

By on Oct 21, 2015 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

There were no completely clear days in 2015. Published on: Oct 21, 2015 – we have not had a chance to update the gallery but you can view these images online at the NASA Worldview website. In 2015 there were 12 days which had 50% or less cloud cover over England. There was one day with about 10% cloud cover. The rest were mostly cloudy with 50-100% cloud cover. There were no days at all that were completely clear of cloud. In 2013 – the first full year of images currently available – there were 13 days that were about 50% or less cloud cover, with only a couple with 10% or less. The rest were 50-100% cloud cover. There were no days completely clear of cloud. Even on the days where the satellite image shows a reasonably cloud free day, the image may have been taken very early before the cloud cover had been produced, so it is possible that there simply are no completely clear days anymore. There is a way to discover the time the images were taken but we have not had the chance to do this yet and to be honest it matter not. No clear day at all is enough information for us. Incredible as that sounds, go see for yourself. Unfortunately NASA only publish images from mid 2012. It would be extremely interesting to see images from the 1970s and 1980.   We liked this statement in the FAQs: Why are there so many clouds? Approximately 70% of the earth’s surface is covered by clouds at any given time. That means there is a good chance that the region you want to see will have some cloud cover. Use the time slider at the bottom of Worldview to view other dates. Most of that cloud was induced cloud produced by aviation. Some scientists will try to tell that’s because of global warming, but the arguments don’t make sense. There is no natural process that is happening now that can create such vast cloud cover over the UK. Average temperatures on land or sea have not warmed, so why is there so much cloud? Simple. Aviation. Below we have compiled a gallery of...

Read More
BA cargo hold fire latest SRM equipment explosion ?

BA cargo hold fire latest SRM equipment explosion ?

By on Sep 9, 2015 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

Increasing numbers of suspicious air disasters seem to be caused by explosions in the on-board, aerosol spraying systems in the front cargo hold of A320s   09.09.2015 Following the spate of aircraft incidents in the past few years, with the most bizarre and suspicious being the Genmanwings Airbus A320, could we have just witnessed at close hand what has occurred to all the other aircraft as we predicted some time ago? Germanwings Flight 9525 was supposedly caused by yet another suicidal pilot, but the fact that a very loud bang was reported just before the plane went down, and the fact that it descended very slowly do not support the official version of events at all. The media went into a creative frenzy with all sorts of nonsense about the second pilot being locked out and the mental illness history of the supposedly suicidal pilot, but many people, including us, simply did not believe it. We said immediately that an explosion of the pressurised dispersal systems in the hold was the likely cause. Now here we are with a similar incident right in front of our eyes, and still they will not acknowledge the truth about what happened despite glaringly obvious video and photographic evidence. British Airways Flight 2276 A Boeing 777-200 bound for Gatwick Airport. Fitted with 2 GE90 engines. A very loud bang was reported by at several passengers, which resulted in the side of the front hold being blown out. If we examine the images it is clear, as any explosives expert will testify, that the metalwork is clearly distorted away from the hold, in the direction of the blast, resulting in a huge gaping hole. this is indicative of a substantial explosion inside the hold. Bent metal aside, the reverse is completely impossible for the simple fact that a burning engine, aside the fact that it is unlikely to actually explode, could not eject enough material and with such force as to blow a hole so large into the fuselage. If the engine had caught fire, the area above and on both sides of the engine would have suffered damage and most of the wing would have been damaged also. This is clearly not the...

Read More
A day in the life of a London sky

A day in the life of a London sky

By on Jun 22, 2015 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

“One fine day…”used to be the start of many a story. Today though most days that start off fine rapidly deteriorate as a fleet of aircraft fly over the UK repeatedly, leaving spreading trails that turn our beautiful blue dawns into streaky, hazy, and eventually grey skies. As London’s fast-paced population scuttle about they seem completely unaware of what is unfolding above their heads, so we captured a few images that spanned a single day to show them what they are missing as they read the papers and fidget obsessively with their dumb-phones. There are lots of images, and some are series of images to show the progression of aircraft trails as they spread. Remarkably some people are still in denial about the fact that our weather is being, at best affected by, or at worst controlled by ’emissions’ from commercial aircraft. To those people we say simply: If you can’t see what is going on then you are just not looking !   Public debate? Ministers and MPs have obviously been ordered to stonewall all inquiries but by doing so they are adding fuel to the fire. If this were simple pollution there would be a massive public debate on why aircraft emissions are blocking our sunshine, not to mention why NATS – National Air Traffic Service – are routing the offending aircraft out of their way to pass over the UK most populated areas.. That debate is not allowed to happen because we are not supposed to even think about this. Whoever is responsible is hoping very hard that we wont even notice it so they can sneak it past us for long enough to normalise it. Sorry guys but we have noticed, we are not happy and we want answers. Once again we refer our ministers to our website’s adopted motto: You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.   All images taken Monday 22nd June – West London – Canon 6D / Canon EF24-105 lens. Nothing you see in any of these images is natural cloud cover. Every bit of what you see originated from...

Read More
Greenland’s black ice is being deliberately melted

Greenland’s black ice is being deliberately melted

By on Nov 7, 2014 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

How Carbon Black is being used to melt Arctic ice, Since first publishing this article some time ago we have discovered this report: Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy and written this accompanying article which explains precisely what is going on with the soot or Carbom Black as it is know.   Published on: Nov 7, 2014 Shocking images of Greenland’s black ice may be caused by the effects of one of the 3 main climate engineering programs. This article on the Slate.com website attributes this black soot-like fallout to wildfires, but we find it hard to believe that fires would cause such a massive amount of what appears to be uniform fallout over such vast areas. The writers have stated that they will be doing analysis of the soot-like layer deposited on the ice which should confirm the source. We would put money on the fact it will turn out to be combusted diesel soot. We would also like to do our own analysis so as to be sure we are getting the real story about this. If this can be proved to be combusted diesel soot then we have a huge piece of evidence to back up our theory about ‘CO2 forcing‘ by commercial aircraft.  All images taken from original article on Slate.com  The link to CO2 and the Global Warming Hoax The supposedly ‘disastrous tipping point‘ of  400ppm, which is claimed by the corporate-backed, climate-alarmist agitators to represent a pivotal threshold above which the world will warm more than 2 degrees Celsius and may lead to runaway warming, was recently recorded in South America. This has been used to fuel global anxiety about the supposedly impending climate catastrophe. The IPCC – the UN’s International Propaganda on Climate Change department – recently reported that “climate catastrophe is only 30 years away“, a completely reckless claim that has no scientific validity whatsoever. The reason this is relevant is because CO2 is now the only remaining thing supporting the now desperately flagging Climate Change Hoax. Look-Up’s exclusive expose’ of a deliberate CO2 forcing program carried out by a fleet of commercially liveried aircraft completely undermines this last leg of the hoax. Look-Up.org.uk also realised that if...

Read More
WTF ?  Explain it quickly

WTF ? Explain it quickly

By on Nov 3, 2014 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

You have just heard about this and want a quick and simple explanation. This page is a condensed version of the website essentially. It takes less than 10 minutes to read and will give you a quick overview of the topic and what is going on. Then you can decide how you want to deal with that information. Uncomfortable information is never welcome we realise, but to ignore this issue would be a huge mistake. If you do nothing else sign the e-petition here or at the base of the page when you have finished reading. You have nothing to lose by doing so and everything to gain.   Introduction A core group of corporate-backed scientists are hell-bent on ignoring the advice from the majority of the world’s scientific community that Climate Engineering – the spraying of aerosolised chemicals from aircraft to create cloud cover – is dangerous, unlikely to have any beneficial effects as it causes more warming than it prevents and completely unnecessary anyway. They are insisting that so-called trials should start very soon. One would imagine that any program that involves spraying chemicals unknown into our atmosphere would go through stringent trials and public approval, but no such process is planned, quite the opposite. Debate on the issue is kept to an absolute minimum, not advertised well, and public involvement is not really welcome. Our presence at the scientific events is tolerated at best. There are, and will not be, any public announcements, consultations or safety trials. No accountability. No way to check what is being sprayed and whether it is safe or indeed any public acknowledgement at all. Our opinion is neither sought nor welcome. These scientists will claim they engaged with the public, but our tolerated presence at the European events and managing to get the odd question in is not what we would call public debate. Why is our media relentlessly reporting on our possible exit from the EU and focusing on migrants and other such stories, but not a single word is mentioned about plans to spray potentially harmful chemicals into our skies to control our weather. Does that seem normal to you? Does that sound like a genuine scientific program designed to...

Read More
The Berlin Declaration was deliberately sabotaged

The Berlin Declaration was deliberately sabotaged

By on Sep 22, 2014 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

The Berlin Declaration attempted to subject SRM to regulation and public approval, so it was sabotaged. One of the most controversial and indeed revealing sessions of the Berlin Climate Engineering Conference 2014 was the Town Hall Meeting. This meeting was proposed by, and attended by, sceptical scientists who had grave concerns about SRM, how it is being pushed forward without due process and the possible ramifications if it is introduced on the back of a perceived emergency without regulation, without proper trials and without public debate and approval as some of the core group of pro-SRM hardliners aligned with the organisers of the event are calling for. It seems we were not alone in our suspicions that those people are hellbent on pushing SRM forward to the point of full implementation as soon as practically possible. There seem to be no plans for public debate or public approval and the suspicion of many was that proposed so-called trials would simply lead to full implementation almost immediately. Watch the meeting on Youtube here.     This meeting laid bare the fear of the organisers and the small clique of scientists and others that we feel are part of the corporate structure behind the event such as David Keith, Clive Hamilton and  Oliver Morton that their plans may be scuppered by those who would prefer a gradual and reasoned approach to SRM. They were all in there ready to sabotage this so as to prevent any form of declaration or agreement, and thereby ensure no public announcements or approval process would ever occur. It seems their intentions, as we had predicted, were to just go ahead and do this as quickly and as quietly as possible.   Jane C.S.Long’s input (21:30) was particularly concerning, as she seems to insinuate that producing a document that simply tries to achieve many sensible and cautious things, is in some way suspicious. So when we look at her profile, again we see she is part of what we consider the ‘complicit organisations’ (those who seek to promote the mindset of climate emergency so as to foster the need to introduce unapproved SRM), so her rather aggressive attack on the document comes as no surprise. Steve’s...

Read More
Aerotoxic Syndrome iscorporate manslaughter

Aerotoxic Syndrome is
corporate manslaughter

By on Jul 18, 2014 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

 Chemicals used in SRM causing a host of acute medical problems and even death in passengers and crews We strongly believe the chemicals used in current Climate Engineering programs are making people sick, at least during flights but more and more cases of serious illness are being reported, especially among long haul passengers and air crews.  Aerotoxic Syndrome is the name given to a host of symptoms that many pilots, long haul and regular flyers experience during or immediately after flights. An article published in the Daily Mail describes the experiences of one pilot who suffered from the condition, but the article seems to suggest the cause is simply leakage of smoke from the engines. We disagree. The simple fact is that if there were such a simple cause, airlines would have fixed it immediately due to the fear of £multi-million  law suits. They simply would not ignore an issue if it were simple to fix as this would be if it were a simple mechanical issue. Passenger aircraft are serviced regularly and the regulations governing the safety of every aspect of the aircraft are incredibly stringent. To suggest that every aircraft in our skies has a mechanical fault that has existed for many years that causes harm to crew and passengers is simply ludicrous. With increasing numbers of people reporting acute illness from flying, crews getting severe chronic illness and even several deaths to date, legal cases pending and many flight crews now complaining bitterly about this issue, this situation simply could not arise. This issue was first recognised more than 20 years ago, so why would the airlines fail to fix the issue if it were caused by smoke leakage. Planes would have been grounded but they haven’t. instead what we see is one of the world’s biggest and most complex cover ups being enacted. the airline know exactly what the real cause is. Debates on the issue have even taken place in parliament, one of which we attended and reported on, and yet the true cause is never mentioned even as a possibility, so we can say with absolute certainty that the aviation industry is lying to us, their staff, passengers, parliament and the general public....

Read More
DONATEInvest in a brighter future

DONATE
Invest in a brighter future

By on Sep 30, 2013 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

Look-Up now relies entirely on donations. We need help funding legal action against UK airlines as well as other campaign projects… Look-Up.org.uk is now at the stage where we need your help for the final push over the next year or two. Sadly I have now exhausted all my capital running this campaign for the past 4 years. We know what’s going on, we can prove it and we know how to stop it. All we need to do is raise enough money to get this into court. Please give as much as you can afford. 100% of all donations go towards the work we do. Sunshine and the air we breathe are fundamental to our lives, our health and our happiness. How dare private corporations mess with our weather and contaminate the air we breathe without our knowledge and consent. How we manage donations General fund We have a general donations method which is not assigned to any specific project. This money will be used to maintain the website and campaign as a whole. If the money accumulates we will put some into projects that fall short of targets. Donate to our general fund via BACS Community Banking   Sort Code: 60-02-09 Account Number: 60656271 Look-up is registered as a not-for-profit environmental organisation. All donations are very gratefully received, but recurring payments are the most beneficial as they allow us to plan ahead and launch more ambitious projects. Specific project donations We have our various projects listed on our projects page, each of which has a donations button. If you are interested in supporting a specific project you can donate to it exclusively. We reserve the right to move money around if needs be but we will try to fund things this way so you know where your money goes. We will publish all our project and financial activities so as to be transparent how the money is used. To read more about this please see our constitution.   Current projects Look-Up Campaign Trailer 0% funded Donation Amount: £ 1.00 £1.00£5.00£10.00£20.00£50.00Donate Now Select Payment Method PayPal Personal Info First Name * Last Name Email Address * Donation Total: £1.00 Climate Engineering Conference 2017 Climate Engineering Conference 2017 documentary...

Read More
Further Information

Further Information

By on Sep 30, 2013 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

This is where you will find most of the content for the website. Version 2 of the UK Climate Engineering Dossier We handed in 2 copies of our dossier. Both were 68 pages of printed and bound documents weighing at several kilos and A4 size. They were handed to the custodian at the door of No. 10 and we filmed this. Downing street claim to have lost them. Need we say more ! We are currently having version 2 prepared by lawyers so as to make the document more legally binding and will be finalising it over the next few weeks. Version 2 will be handed into the new prime minister when government reconvenes in a few weeks.   also Films of passenger planes with no passengers and chemical cargo at Heathrow Terminal 5. Time lapse of skies being desecrated by planes. Recordings of phone conversations with the organisations involved that prove a cover up is in progress. They can be clearly heard lying and contradicting each-other. Our first legal case against one of the organisations involved. Lab results of human tissue samples from UK. Lab results of atmospheric fibres collected in the UK.   PLEASE USE THE MENU ON THE RIGHT TO NAVIGATE THIS SECTION     We still have a mountain of data to upload, but we are struggling with trying to get so many things done simultaneously. All in good time as they say. Despite the sense of urgency we feel, we also feel that the phrase slowly slowly catchy monkey has never been more appropriate....

Read More
New to Climate Engineering

New to Climate Engineering

By on Sep 30, 2013 in Homepage Feature | 0 comments

When someone first becomes aware of this phenomena, it can be a very unsettling time. Look-Up tries to help you manage this process by giving you all the information you need to know to answer those initial questions simply and concisely, and then to point you towards further information, both here and in other forums and organisations, depending on how you want to deal with that information. It has been prepared over time, based mostly on our own investigations. We do not simply regurgitate material we find online like most other pages, and indeed have become a global leader in new information and hypothesis in  this field. The site attempts to be a source of useful information for everybody, from those who have just become aware of it, to those who are already knowledgeable about the subject and are simply trying to source the latest information and ideas about what is going on. This subject is large and complex, and the first steps to finding out about it can be overwhelming, both in terms of the amount of information there is to absorb and the emotional journey many people undergo, but also the amount of disinformation available online.   Official denial As awareness grows, our government will be forced to admit this is already happening, but are very unlikely to actually admit they have always known, or to try to stop those perpetrating it from continuing. The government disinformation and denial machine is working very hard to try to deflect any questions it is asked. A classic example of this is the letter here, from Anne Rud, the minister for Energy and Climate Change: The official line seems to be one of trying to gently ease the public into accepting Climate Engineering, without having to make any public admission of its existence, or carrying out any public consultation or approval process whatsoever. We suspect the reason for this is that the public are highly unlikely to approve it, and the process involved in asking them to do so would be long and tumultuous, so they seem to be trying very hard to slip it under the public radar. Incredible as that sounds, they also seem to be succeeding at this....

Read More