Professor Mark Lawrence – IASS – confirms who is behind much of the European Climate Engineering research base. Though the movement is funded through scientific institutions the primary source of funding, as we had suspected, is the EU. This is an interesting event that occurred just after the Berlin CER Symposium that we attended in 2015. We will report further on it at a later date, but the point of this post is to realise that the EU is driving the entire GW/CC/CE subterfuge.
The EU seems determined to draw the UK into an undemocratic superstate, to control every aspect of our lives including our weather. Our ability to challenge current Climate Engineering programs will be severely affected if we give up our sovereignty to this sinister, un-elected and undemocratic organisation.
Please VOTE to LEAVE
An interesting paper, yet to be published, claims that aviation is producing a reflective haze that is affecting the climate. The paper is titled Accidental Geoengineering (The term used in the US for Climate Engineering).
Long suggests that a high-altitude “ice haze,” created by water and other emissions from aircraft, is responsible. “I’m talking about a sub-visual contrail-generated haze of ice, which we do not classify as a cloud but gives blue sky more of a whitish tint.”
Climate Engineering proponents have long described the effects of Climate Engineering as producing exactly the same effect. So are we seriously to believe that aviation is accidentally creating what Climate Engineers are planning to create but haven’t yet, or can we assume this is already happening covertly and they just have not officially admitted it yet?
It will be interesting to know the conclusions of the paper when it is finally published.
Read the article from the NOAA website here.
It is with great sadness and utter dismay that we report yet another A320 has gone down as predicted. Sadness of course for the passengers, but dismay at the fact that still nobody seems to be questioning publicly why so many A320s are crashing in mysterious circumstances. Of course the immediate claims of terrorism are being trotted off as authorities panic, wondering what on earth they are going to say this time to an increasingly alarmed public following the latest in what is likely to be a mid-air explosion caused by pressurised Climate Engineering systems on board the A320.
We will expand on this as the conflicting stories, unfounded assertions and blatant lies begin to appear in the world’s press.
Read more info here:
This is what the weather forecast would be like if those presenting it were allowed to be honest.
Enjoy your grey. Good night.
On several occasions now, The MET Office have stated that it is impossible for a sky to be completely covered by contrails, so we politely suggest they might want to go to Specsavers! There has not been a single natural cloud in the sky over the entire London skyline – that’s over 600 square miles by the way – for the last few days. Leaving aside if you believe it is deliberate or not, it is blocking our sunshine and should not be happening.
Read more here.
It is only in local news papers and radio stations that we see reports of strange skies persisting trails and unusual flight patterns noticed by an increasingly concerned public. Mainstream media have implemented a total blackout on the topic, unless it is to ridicule it or those who report on it.
Here is a great example of a local paper reporting on what amounts to suspicious and possibly illegal behavior of aircraft over Wales. No aircraft should fly in circles unless stacking, leave persistent trails or be invisible on tracking websites, and the combination of all 3 is indicative of aerosol spraying.
Read the article here.
Read more and see the accompanying interviews here.
We talk to Prof. Dr. Andreas Oschlies – GEOMAR | Kiel Institute – about the perceived emergency framing of the CE debate and our concerns that it is being deliberately fostered by certain scientists who we believe to have links to Poli-Com interests.
More information here.
David Morrow – is a Faculty Fellow with the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment at American University and a Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy at George Mason University, discusses the slippery slope argument and why CE research should not even be happening.
More information here.
The second in a series of 5 interviews recorded at the Climate Engineering research Symposium in Berlin last year. Prof. Dr Konrad Ott discusses the lack of balanced public information on the CE.
More information here.